Election Night Results

The Date will show October 30th but it's now 23 November and all votes are now counted.

This Blog Will Post the Election Night Results (Use Your Refresh Button to See the Latest):

Following Sources are also Expected to Post the Results as they Become Available:

http://www.co.cal.md.us/

http://www.thebaynet.com/

http://elections.state.md.us/elections/2010/results/General/CountyResults_county_05_local_1.html

Following Results Provided by the Election Board to the Candidates are Unofficial:

First District

Jerry Clark - 13233 (winner)
Kimberly Mackall - 11754
Charlie Donnelly - 5719

Second District

Susan Shaw - 15374 (winner)
Pat Nutter - 15040 (winner)
Steve Weems - 14646 (winner)
Bill Phalen - 9356

Third District

Evan Slaughenhoupt - 13133 (winner)
Wilson Parran - 12996
Kelly McConkey - 11769
Barbara Stinnett - 11195

Write-in Votes:

Linda Kelley - 2880
Rich Falcone - 77
Others - 171

Response to Calvert County Sheriff's FOP

1. What would your position be to make all courthouse deputies become 40 hour employees? Currently, 5 are part time employees and it leaves the courthouse short staffed on occasion.


It is unacceptable to have occasions where security is not properly manned at the courthouse. I would support adjustments to ensure sufficient satisfaction of manning requirements.


2. In the last 8 years deputies have lost four pay steps, had no adjustments to their pay scale, and have had minimal cost of living raises. During this same time period County Employees have only lost two pay steps. This situation affects bring home pay, OT rates, retirement contribution and ultimately our total retirement. Do you have a plan for the deputies to recover their pay steps and receive pay raises that they deserve?


Deputies deserve pay equity, particularly since they perform among the most dangerous functions on behalf of the county citizens. The plan would be to provide pay equity.


3. Do you support Collective Bargaining for the deputies?
If yes, to what extent? If no, why not?


Yes.


4. Would you ever consider forming a Police Department in Calvert County?


No. As long as the population of Calvert County does not exceed projected “Build-out” of 31,000 residences, the current Sheriff’s Office and State Police presence appears appropriate.


5. Over the last 8 years the Sheriff’s request for more deputies has been reduced every year. Every year the Sheriff’s Office responds to more calls for service with inadequate staffing, which puts deputies at risk. What is your opinion on the current staffing of the Sheriff’s Office? Are you willing to increase manpower to proper levels for the county’s population?


Yes. I did a ride-along with the Sheriff’s Office over a year ago and saw first-hand the manning constraints. I support increased numbers of Sheriff Deputies and improved tools.


6. The county currently has a policy that requires deputies injured in the line of duty to stop receiving regular pay checks. While the deputy is off recovering from the work related injury they receive payments from workers compensation. The injured deputy must pay for healthcare out of these workers compensation checks and doesn’t receive credit towards retirement during the recovery time. What is your opinion of this policy? Are you willing to work with the FOP on revising the policy?


Yes.

Calvert Crusade for Children Questions and Responses

Candidate name Evan Slaughenhoupt Office Sought Calvert County Commissioner

July 20, 2010

Question 1: What role should the office you seek play in the lives of children and families?

Commissioners should continually improve our Quality-of-Life so children and families have a
safe, secure and friendly environment. We should enhance the Ethics code to improve
transparency ensuring equal treatment, improve public safety tools and resources, improve the
education formula, and reduce the current over-taxation of the families and small businesses.
Unlike all current commissioners who allowed property taxes to actually increase by keeping tax rates constant, I believe we should lower tax rates.

Question 2: What are the most critical issues facing Calvert County families in the next three to five years, and how should these issues be addressed within the office you seek?

Government growth and government pension requirements concern me. Public Safety, an
essential function of local government and Education comprise the largest share of the General
Fund, are also top priority considerations, and cause the most public discussion. County staff
needs to become customer focused, define and deliver a process flow that guides would-be
business owners, enhance and actually implement an

Primary Election - Refresh Your Browser for Latest

September 14, 2010 Calvert County Primary Election Unofficial Results:

County Commissioner:
Third District :
Total Votes --- (Final)
Timothy Hardesty 1780
Evan Slaughenhoupt 3352

Results of today's Commissioner Race shows the following candidates moving forward:

Republican:

1st District: Jerry Clark
2nd District: Susan Shaw, Pat Nutter, Steve Weems
3rd District: Evan Slaughenhoupt

Democrat:

1st District: Kim Mackall
2nd District: Bill Phelen
3rd District: Wilson Parran, Barbara Stinnett, Kelly McConkey

Try it address for more details:

http://www.co.cal.md.us/assets/elections/2010Primary/2010PRIMARY-CHANNEL6.pdf

Results by District and Precinct (followed by Other Successful Candidate Names and Positions)--

District 1 Precint 1 Solomons Rescue Squad (13150 H. G. Trueman Road, Solomons)
Timothy Hardesty 63
Evan Slaughenhoupt 143

District 1 Precint 2 Southern Middle School (9615 H. G. Trueman Road, Lusby)
Timothy Hardesty 66
Evan Slaughenhoupt 142

District 1 Precint 3 St. Leonard Elementary (5370 St. Leonard Road, Lusby)
Timothy Hardesty 79
Evan Slaughenhoupt 113

District 1 Precint 4 Mutual Elementary (1455 Ball Road, Port Republic)
Timothy Hardesty 72
Evan Slaughenhoupt 113

District 1 Precint 5 Patuxent Elementary (35 Appeal Lane, Lusby)
Timothy Hardesty 68
Evan Slaughenhoupt 117

District 1 Precint 6 Patuxent High School (12485 Rousby Hall Road, Lusby)
Timothy Hardesty 76
Evan Slaughenhoupt 93

District 1 Precint 75 Mill Creek Middle (12200 Margaret Taylor Road/Southern Connector, Lusby)
Timothy Hardesty 63
Evan Slaughenhoupt 113

District 2 Precint 1 St. Leonard Fire Department (200 Calvert Beach Road, St. Leonard)
Timothy Hardesty 67
Evan Slaughenhoupt 143

District 2 Precint 2 Calvert Fairgrounds Building (Fair Drive/Route 231, Prince Frederick)
Timothy Hardesty 72
Evan Slaughenhoupt 118

District 2 Precint 3 Huntingtown High School (4125 Solomons Island Road, Huntingtown)
Timothy Hardesty 109
Evan Slaughenhoupt 214

District 2 Precint 4 Elks Lodge (1015 Dares Beach Road, Prince Frederick)
Timothy Hardesty 54
Evan Slaughenhoupt 59

District 2 Precint 5 Plum Point Elementary (1245 Plum Point Road, Huntingtown)
Timothy Hardesty 93
Evan Slaughenhoupt 170

District 2 Precint 6 Huntingtown Fire Department (4030 Old Town Road, Huntingtown)
Timothy Hardesty 84
Evan Slaughenhoupt 154

District 2 Precint 7 Northern Middle School (1954 Chaneyville Road, Owings)
Timothy Hardesty 61
Evan Slaughenhoupt 114

District 2 Precint 8 Calvert Pines Senior Center (450 West Dares Beach Road, Prince Frederick)
Timothy Hardesty 79
Evan Slaughenhoupt 156

District 3 Precint 1 North Beach Fire Department (8536 Bayside Road, Chesapeake Beach)
Timothy Hardesty 34
Evan Slaughenhoupt 77

District 3 Precint 2 Beach Elementary (7900 Old Bayside Road, Chesapeake Beach)
Timothy Hardesty 66
Evan Slaughenhoupt 116

District 3 Precint 3 Sunderland Elementary (150 Clyde Jones Road, Sunderland)
Timothy Hardesty 82
Evan Slaughenhoupt 119

District 3 Precint 4 Windy Hill Elementary (9550 Boyds Turn Road, Owings)
Timothy Hardesty 73
Evan Slaughenhoupt 118

District 3 Precint 5 Windy Hill Middle School (9560 Boyds Turn Road, Owings)
Timothy Hardesty 70
Evan Slaughenhoupt 155

District 3 Precint 6 Dunkirk Fire Department (3170 West Ward Road, Dunkirk)
Timothy Hardesty 86
Evan Slaughenhoupt 206

District 3 Precint 7 Mt. Harmony Elementary (900 West Mt. Harmony Road, Owings)
Timothy Hardesty 67
Evan Slaughenhoupt 142

District 3 Precint 8 Northeast Community Center (4075 Gordon Stinnett Avenue, Chesapeake Beach)
Timothy Hardesty 38
Evan Slaughenhoupt 83

Early Voting:
Timothy Hardesty 91
Evan Slaughenhoupt 238

Absentee Voting:
Timothy Hardesty 40
Evan Slaughenhoupt 77

Final Absentee Voting:
Timothy Hardesty 26
Evan Slaughenhoupt 39

Responses to Dunkirk Area Concerned Citizens Association Questions

Questions to Board of County Commissioners Candidates

1. In regards to the drip irrigation sewer system proposed for the Shoppes @ Apple Greene in Dunkirk, County Attorney Emanuel Demedis has stated that the Board of County Commissioners may not amend the County Code to increase the setback to 500’ from adjoining properties. Would you support and work with the Apple Greene Community to get the State of Maryland and MDE to support the proposed 500 foot Community Protection Zone which is a buffer between residential property and commercial sewage systems? Why? Why not?

Yes. I would work to get the State of Maryland and MDE to resolve the ongoing issue of the Shoppes at Apple Greene and the residents at Apple Greene. I was one of over 800 who signed the petition in support of the Community Protection Zone. From an early conversation with the environmental engineer Mr. Klein, who was hired by the residents, he and I both agreed that the initial concept for the drip irrigation system was a good idea, but that in practice such systems are not yet proven.

I met previously with the developer and suggested improvements to their plans to address the concerns of Apple Greene. Some of those ideas are now part of the developer’s current plan, but still needs additional improvements. I still believe that a successful resolution is possible so that both the residents’ concerns and the developer’s desire can be satisfied.

2. Do you agree or disagree with term limits? Why? Why not?
A. For elected County officials?
B. For County appointed Board members?

I disagree with arbitrary term limits for all elected positions. I understand the frustration that causes citizens to desire term limits. However, term-limits limit the right of citizens to choose representatives. Term-limits also deny citizens representation by talented individuals willing to serve. Having said that, the single most effective means of term-limits is through an educated and enlightened voting public since politicians know when to enter politics, but not when to leave.

3. In your vision for Calvert County Education, what needs improvement
and how will the County fund these improvements? Please include special needs children’s programs.

I believe the current Education Funding Formula needs improvement. The current formula is flawed; clearly some factors were missing which contributed to the recent salary crisis. Unfortunately, the current officials opted to continue with the same flawed formula. As to funding any improvements, Public Safety and Education comprise the largest share of the General Fund and are an essential function of local government.

As to special needs children’s programs, government has an absolute responsibility to care for those who need it the most or, unable to take care of themselves. It is unconscionable that funding was recently reduced for the handicapped throughout Maryland and Calvert County. I will work to correct that.

Government growth and government pension requirements concern me and need more effective management in the upcoming years. County tax rates should not be raised. Just as families reduce expenses during times of reduced income, the county government must also re-evaluate priorities and reduce spending. Activities currently performed by the government which the private sector could perform need reviewing for reduction, or handed-over to the private sector.

Responses to Farm Bureau Questions

• Under the current zoning regulations Farm Families are treated as Developers when it comes to dividing lots from their land holdings for their children, even if the property is preserved. How would you change zoning regulations to reduce this burden on our farm families?

Surely this is a case of unintended consequences that I would insist a re-look at all the zoning requirements that affect the farms, and request input from the farming community to identify specific areas that need improvement. Farms (when dividing for family members) should not be treated as Developers. If elected Commissioner, I will work to rectify this issue.

• What will Calvert County agriculture look like in the next 4 years and what will be your role as commissioner in the direction Calvert County agriculture takes?

Whether it’s the next 4 years or 40 years, I envision that several of the current farms may undergo even greater stress caused by the current (and what seems to be our never ending national economic crisis). To mitigate that stress, I support alternative agricultural efforts that preserve existing farms. If we value open space and if we value the contributions of the farming communities, government has a responsibility to encourage the next generation of farmers.

The best way to encourage farming in Calvert County is to help make farming profitable. A profitable farmer will be less inclined to quit, or sell-off their property to develop residential areas. I am open to working with our farming community and the Farm Bureau to craft legislation that ensures the long term viability of the farming industry here in Calvert County.

• Calvert County has an outstanding agricultural land preservation program that has been recognized throughout the country. What will you do to ensure that agricultural land preservation continues to be supported through these uncertain economic times and what specific steps would you introduce to promote the program?

I support the existing agricultural land preservation program and would encourage the Economic Development Department of the county government to become more proactive in promoting Calvert County farms. I support the funding of this program, even in tough economic times. We cannot sacrifice land preservation just because the economy is tough, nor allow it to become an excuse for developers to come in and buy up land on the cheap.

Additionally, I would encourage the Board of Education to look for ways to enhance awareness of the farming opportunities and challenges to school students.

• County farmers have always considered themselves good steward of the land. Compliance with regulations on nutrient management, soil conservation and water quality are standard operating procedures for our farmers. Recently, new proposed regulations for the Total Maximum Daily Load of nutrients in our tributaries have our farmers concerned. Are you familiar with these regulations and if so, how would you as commissioner work to insures these regulations are for all to bear, not just placed squarely on the back of agriculture?

As a County Commissioner, I would push back any unfunded state mandates that essentially require local officials and the farming community to implement, unless those mandates are accompanied with funding.

Local governments will face zoning challenges to align with environmental requirements, continue to provide inspection, and enforcement for storm-water management and erosion/sediment control as well as managing land use and development in ways that minimize loads from new development. We should avoid excessive regulations that will "in effect" bankrupt the farming community.

• The term “Sustainable Agriculture” has become synonymous with farmers markets and vineyards. How do you see sustainable agriculture expanding into other areas that will support agriculture or agri-business interest and better serve our county residents?

I understand that a Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program offers USDA competitive grants that support agriculture efforts that are profitable, environmentally sound, and good for communities. Grants are offered on two different tiers with separate application requirements and eligibility criteria. I would encourage the local county government to work with the farming community to win grant money for farmers who have visions of exploring other areas such as vineyards, flowers, natural or organic products, or more traditional farming. I support activities designed to make farming profitable.

Reponses to Calvert Education Association Questions

CALVERT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
QUESTIONALRE FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONER CANDIDATE

1. What are your top objectives for Calvert County if you are elected County Commissioner?

Ethics Reform – Improved transparency is needed to ensure that citizens are treated fairly.

Improve Education Funding Formula – Current formula is flawed; clearly some factors were missing which contributed to the recent salary crisis.

Improve Business Environment – Small business needs help to create employment opportunities.

2. What is your view of the purpose of public education?

Primary purpose is to assist parents who are ultimately responsible for the successful education of their children. Public education needs to ensure students receive the opportunity to learn how to think, from analytic solutions, and become responsible citizens.

3. If you are elected Commissioner, how do you anticipate understanding the Calvert Public Schools and budgeting needs of the school system? Particularly the needs of the school system for testing and other new mandates from the State.

The Board of County Commissioners should work with the Board of Education to establish the framework/expectations to be implemented by the school system. Teachers and educators/staff should feel comfortable knowing that as Commissioner, I would hold their advice and counsel in strict confidence. I will reject any unfunded mandate and encourage tailoring others towards local needs and objectives.

4. Would you consider renegotiating the current funding formula (with the Board of Education) to provide increased resources for Education?

My campaign literature, from the very beginning, advocates improving the education funding formula. It should be obvious to even the most casual observer that it needs to be revised. Sadly, the county recently decided to continue with the same flawed formula.

5. What changes would you like to see in the current operation of the school system?

I support giving home schooled students access to county resources. For example, a talented athlete ought to be permitted to play sports for the school in the district in which the student resides.

6. Once contracts are negotiated between employee groups and the Calvert County Public Schools, are you committed to full funding of the negotiated agreement?

Contracts are recognized as legal documents that are enforceable by law. If one party of the contract needs modification to the terms, some acceptable relief needs to be provided to the other party.

7. What experience, skills, and knowledge would you bring to this position?

Former President of a civic association, retired federal employee, and a Masters Degree in Strategic Intelligence as well as current employment as a systems engineer provides me a unique background suitable to bringing new ideas, approaches, and personality to the Board of County Commissioners.

8. How do you feel about school vouchers?

There seems to be little need for vouchers in Calvert County even though some schools need improvements. Demonstrated success in some large city problematic schools occurred with the use of vouchers, but not necessarily relevant for Calvert.

9. What is your opinion of a fair share (agency fee) for teachers?

Teachers should have the option to pay only the amount of union dues needed for the union to represent them for the cost of the union in negotiating and administrating the collective bargaining agreement. The rationale for my position is that not all teachers/employees agree with the political philosophy of a given union. This is a matter of fairness and supports the individual’s ability to freely express themselves.

Evan Slaughenhoupt, July 10, 2010

Questions & Responses - League of Women Voters of Calvert County

CAMPAIGN WEBSITE ADDRESS: http://www.evanslaughenhoupt.com

1. BUDGET: What are the top budget priorities for the next four years?

Government growth and government pension requirements concern me and need more effective management in the upcoming years. Public Safety, an essential function of local government and Education comprise the largest share of the General Fund, are also top priority considerations, and cause the most public discussion.

2. TAXES: How do you propose the county address the problem of reduced tax revenue – cut spending or raise tax rates? Be specific – what expenses, what taxes?

County tax rates should not be raised. Just as families reduce expenses during times of reduced income, the county government must also re-evaluate priorities and reduce spending. Activities currently performed by the government which the private sector could perform need reviewing for reduction, or handed-over to the private sector.

3. TRANSPORTATION: What are your best ideas for solving the traffic backups in Solomons on the Thomas Johnson Bridge in Solomons, and on Routes 4 in Prince Frederick and Dunkirk?

Before the pending bridge replacement in Solomons, we should offer incentives for the private sector to enhance busing or even a ferry operation. Establish a goal of improved safety and traffic flow (i.e., longer acceleration and deceleration lanes accompanying a legal U-Turn) that include closing deadly at-grade cross-overs.

4. CHILDREN AND YOUTH: Children currently lack afterschool activities and families are under more stress. Should the county fund the use of schools for afterschool activities?

No. Children and youth need greater influence of families, churches, and charities playing a larger role. There is a relationship where greater presence and involvement of government means a weakening of family, church and charity. That relationship is out-of-balance and needs changing to strengthen families, churches, and charities.

5. EDUCATION: The county’s formula for funding education is 50% of the total General Fund budget. Do you think it should be more or less than that? If you think it should be more, what other expenses would you cut?

I advocate revising the current funding formula whereas the county recently decided to continue with the same flawed formula. Pending a newly constructed formula, I would leave the current percentage unchanged. More so than money, authoritative parenting is most strongly related to higher achievement according to objective studies.

6. BUSINESS: How can Calvert County attract more high technology and clean industry and businesses to enlarge our tax base?

Maryland and Calvert County need to become more business friendly. County staff needs to become customer focused, define and deliver a process flow that guides would-be business owners, enhance and actually implement an improved Ethics code, and ensure citizens are treated fairly in an environment of transparency.

7. ECONOMIC GROWTH: What is your plan to facilitate the funding and building of an adequate conference and convention facility in Calvert County within the next five years to meet the needs of Calvert citizens? Do not use lack of funds to explain your answer.

Such a facility could negatively impact hosting events and activities at the Calvert Marine Museum and St. Leonard Firehouse. However, one approach other than Capital Improvement (tax dollars) would offer incentives for a private developer to construct such a facility centrally located on county-owned Prince Frederick property.

8. TERM LIMITS: What is your position on term limits for the BOCC? Explain.

Term-limits limit the right of citizens to choose representatives. Term-limits also deny citizens representation by talented individuals willing to serve. However, the single most effective means of term-limits is through an educated and enlightened voting public since politicians know when to enter politics, but not when to leave.



I APPROVE FOR PUBLICATION MY RESPONSE TO THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.

Signed: Evan K. Slaughenhoupt, Jr. Date _____July 17, 2010_____

Did You Know?

Calvert County recently received a triple A bond rating, but did you know the current Board of County Commissioners are responsible for:

Real Property Tax Rates:
Higher than Anne Arundel, Montgomery, and 5 other counties?

Income Tax Rates:
Higher than Anne Arundel and 5 other counties?

Recordation Tax Rate:
Second highest in Maryland surpassed only by Frederick County?

Hotel Tax Rate:
Eighth highest in Maryland?

Source: Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation, Maryland Association of Counties, and Calvert County Government Bond Rating Presentation, April 2010.

Questions & Responses

Follow are 5 Questions from Mr. Arthur Carson of Lusby and associated responses:


1. Question: Do you support the continued program of limiting both commercial and residential growth?

Response: The Comprehensive Plan is the official policy document for the County. This document is created with much input from the citizens, and then approved by the Board of County Commissioners. This document is the primary source of direction for commercial and residential "growth." As guided by this plan, Calvert County has about 31,000 residences with an estimate of achieving “Build-out” of 37,000 residences being between 2020 and 2030.

The “rate” of growth is affected by various tools; two such are the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (AFPO) which is used to ensure sufficient county resources exists (such as enough seats in school) before proceeding with new home developments; and Transferrable Development Rights (TDR) that allows for instance a farm to sell development lots to others for development of properties at another location. Commercial development, as described in the Calvert County Comprehensive Plan and various Town Center Master Plans, are focused in the various town centers. I support this approach to commercial and residential development as do a majority by the citizens of Calvert County.


2. Question: What are your thoughts about both the department of Economic Development and Planning and Zoning?

Response: Presuming your question refers to the role of these departments as it relates to residential and commercial development. The original purpose of the Department of Economic Development was to help employers expand or come to Calvert County, i.e., to create jobs. This is a good purpose; even more important given the current economic climate. Additionally, they often assist the County in receiving Federal and State grants. I fully support the concept of Economic Development. However, like all governmental organizations, we must examine how well are they performing by instilling a greater use of metrics, and basically seek ways for improvement.

As mentioned elsewhere on this Blog site, County staff members from Planning and Zoning, Economic Development, and Finance & Budget need to orchestrate a series of workshops with some small business owners and citizens who desire opening businesses. This workshop should produce a clearly identifiable and easy to understand flowchart which identifies the steps needed for start-up. Currently, the need for an individual to shuffle from one office to another to learn what is needed only to find the need to go back and forth is unacceptable.

We need to ensure a level playing field for these businesses. All too often, a sense of frustration arises by a lack of transparency. Transparency is improved by having robust Ethics and Integrity Policies. Reforms that include routine training and awareness for county employees are absolutely essential and overdue. This is very important to me and Ethics are high on my list. Thus, I would want to make sure the county employees perform free from undue political influence.


3. Question: How will you maintain services and still reduce taxes?

Response: During the early 1990s, the “piggy back” income tax for Calvert County increased from 20% of the State Income Tax bill to 50%. Surely, the County Government can go on a spending diet to allow for some reduction of the County “piggy back” income tax.

Among the activities needed is to encourage a re-evaluation of those services truly needed to be perform by government versus those currently being performed by government that would be better implemented by private entities. By reducing the governmental role and encouraging an improved business climate, the citizens could see their taxes reduced while still having needs satisfied.


4. Question: What are your thoughts about the Patuxent Business Park?

Response: In short, the Patuxent Business Park (PBP) is a noble intention that failed miserably. Yet to receive its first occupant, one of the items of concern is the lack of high-speed data networks. I support giving incentives to have Wireless Broadband Networks throughout Calvert County. Such a capability would not only help secure new businesses at the PBP, but would help satisfy the needs of many residents who live in rural areas (and not so rural), and currently lack even access to the cable television.


5. Question: It appears ethics have been abused in county government employees but the commissioners have not acted because of merit employee status. How would you correct this?

Response: While I served on the Ethics Commission, it became apparent the code needed revision and its actual implementation made a higher priority. Having participated with other southern Maryland counties (St. Marys, Charles, Anne Arundel) and the state ethics commission, I was among those on the Calvert County Ethics Commission who began redrafting the code. Citizens should be aware that the revised code is likely to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners during this election season. I would participate in the dialogue to ensure the revised code receives its due attention.

Tales from the Trail

INTRODUCTION

Visiting citizens at their homes is helpful for a grass-roots candidate. I am learning much. For instance, anti-incumbency sentiment throughout the nation, most evident in recent primary and special elections is not limited to just outside of Maryland. This sentiment prevails throughout Maryland and includes voters in Calvert County.

From March 2009, when I first participated at a Tea Party Rally in Solomons, the beginning of my door-to-door meetings in July 2009, to this day, I’m hearing a level of anger that is simmering and is likely to exert itself in this year’s election.

A one-word description for Calvert County is the word unique. Nowhere else can residents live so near to Washington D.C., and yet have a blend of suburban, water and farm living. The recent Triple A bond rating, no doubt evidence of a conservatively-based financial decision process is clearly a positive.

Underlying the positive, however, are some areas needing improvement. Voters sense those in power all too often eventually become deaf to citizen concerns while becoming captured by the so called “Trappings of Power.”

Citizens throughout the nation are particularly angry largely from perceived arrogance of elected officials. With this as a back-drop, I find it fitting to “speak the truth to power.”

SPENDING

Continued spending, actually increased spending because of increasing growth in government is one of the primary concerns expressed by those in the “Taxed Enough Already” movement, at the self-described Tea Party rallies. At the local level, Calvert County Government celebrates opening a $20 Million community pool while citizens see homes going into foreclosure because of the depressed economy.

Recently, the county government spent over $4 Million to purchase and run a golf course instead of assuring a positive business climate that would foster private small businesses to thrive. Although the county government now manages this golf course, it has yet to adopt a “good neighbor” policy which would include constructing appropriate netting to protect several homes already damaged from errant golf balls.

TRANSPORTATION

Road construction and maintenance, an appropriate role of government continues, but with some questionable expenses such as the nearly million dollars of tax-payer money, spent for a traffic circle at the southern tip of Solomons Island.

Though the county staff did an excellent effort clearing roads during the recent winter snow storms, not every neighborhood received the same level of responsiveness. Communities within Huntingtown in particular needed to make specific calls to the county commissioners before snow removal crews arrived.

Most sadly, the county government is not holding the State Highway Administration accountable to “do the right thing” and correct several dangerous cross-over intersections along the major highway artery that runs along the spine of Calvert County. Closing dangerous cross-overs is only a portion of improvements needed. Improved traffic flow and improved safety must become mutual goals.

LIBERTY

For over a hundred years, since the time of Woodrow Wilson, political progressives of several political parties also self-identified liberals, socialists and communists, and even some elements of the environmentalists; guided policies, implemented changes, and drastically altered the course of our nation.

Their direction fundamentally changed our country from one being “Under God” towards one that is heading to be “Under Enslavement”. Greater growth of government at all levels national, state, and local permeates the lives of us all changing each from individuals with equal rights to a collective of dependants vying for scraps from the Government. In short, the stronger the Government, the weaker are families, churches, and charities.

Locally, initiatives such as End Hunger in Calvert County can all too easily become politicized during an election year. While noble efforts of families, churches, and charities, its very nature could be adversely thwarted if expectations arise for the county government to participate under the belief of a compassionate government.

BUSINESS CLIMATE

Small business owners, or owners to be, experience a hostile business climate in Maryland. That sentiment is also felt here in Calvert County. At a minimum, the following needs to occur.

1. County staff members from planning and zoning, economic development, and finance & budget need to orchestrate a series of workshops with some small business owners and citizens who desire opening businesses. This workshop should produce a clearly identifiable and easy to understand flowchart which identifies the steps needed for start-up. Currently, the need for an individual to shuffle from one office to another to learn what is needed only to find the need to go back and forth is unacceptable.

2. A second step is to ensure a level playing field for these businesses. All too often, a sense of frustration arises by a lack of transparency. Transparency is improved by having robust Ethics and Integrity Policies. Reforms that include routine training and awareness for county employees are absolutely essential and overdue.

BUILD-OUT

Build-out is a term commonly used to describe Calvert County achieving 37,000 residences. Currently, the county has about 31,000 residences with build-out estimates to occur between the years of 2020 and 2030.

Currently, long term planning appears to be focused towards “what we’re having for lunch today”. On a yearly basis, the Board of County Commissioners settles upon a budget with some funding projections identified in the out years.

The Calvert County Comprehensive Master Plan and its corresponding set of Town Center Master Plans are used to guide the day-to-day zoning requirements. These Master Plans are visionary documents like an artist’s rendition. The associated zoning reflects the intended implementation. However, a very important aspect is not yet included. That aspect consists of a set of blueprints that can be used to guide the yearly budgeting process.

For example, one can document the number of schools, teachers and Sheriff Deputies that currently support the 31,000 residences, but how many will be needed at build-out? Once an assessment is made for build-out, then a more predictable growth chart (a set of blueprints) can be produced to guide the yearly budgeting process and thereby making a more predictive and informed decisions for the out years.

FARMING & WATERWAY

Besides suburban development, Calvert County remains viable for developing agriculture and for waterway uses. Previous efforts, for example, to save the farming community often with good intentions had some unintended consequences.

Members of the farming community are not asking for much. Some simply ask for drivers to understand that large farm equipment needs to occasionally use roads to go from one farm to another. Asking for driver patience and understanding is not only reasonable, being patient and understanding is the right thing to do.

Farms suffer from forces of nature that makes growing and harvesting crops a challenge. Worsening this challenge are unintended impacts imposed by zoning requirements that need to be readdressed.

For example, to provide supplemental income, one farming couple began using their barn to rebuild automobiles. The automotive activity did not change the footprint, nor the production of the farming activity. County authorities forced the shutdown of the automobile activity resulting in the owners suffering loss of income and heading towards foreclosure. A basic responsibility of ensuring the “pursuit of happiness” was not met by the County Government. Clearly, improvements are needed.

The Calvert Marine Museum provides wonderful opportunities to learn about the waterway. It also provides an assist to our tourist industry.

The recent Intergenerational Earth Day celebration at Asbury-Solomons provided a reminder of the importance of good stewardship of our water ways.

The Southern Maryland Oyster Cultivation Society, a volunteer organization is also building public awareness of the need for oyster restoration to improve local water quality.

LAND USE

I support improved community input for land use decisions. Currently, funds are identified for fiscal year 2012 to perform a feasibility study of public water and sewer in St. Leonard, a Minor Town Center.

During the ongoing redraft of the St. Leonard Town Center Master Plan, it became apparent many citizens in the St. Leonard area desire more information about the master plan and implications of its associated zoning requirements. They have some valid concerns.

As a County Commissioner, I will move to zero-out the current sewer feasibility study and would only support re-instating it after a properly conducted survey that included all residents within the St. Leonard zip code.

TAXES

It may be an old saying that only death and taxes are a certainty, but elected officials should work hard to reduce taxes, not look to grow the government. A prime means to reduce taxes is to first reduce wasteful spending.

Any function being done by the Government that is not absolutely necessary and could be done by the private sector is wasteful. An improvement needed is to re-look at the priorities of the budgeted functions and then fund only those that are really necessary.

During the early 1990s, the “piggy back” income tax for Calvert County increased from 20% of the State Income Tax bill to 50%. Surely, the County Government can go on a spending diet to allow for some reduction of the County “piggy back” income tax.

I believe that just as the youth pay no taxes until they become productive, seniors on a fixed income have earned the right to pay a "reduced tax rate", and the elderly who become more dependent upon others should no longer pay taxes. Such reductions are a “respect” for our elders; one that needs to return to our culture, and is long overdue.

EDUCATION

By any measure, Calvert County schools rank 1st, 2nd, or 3rd along with Howard and Montgomery County schools. The State of Maryland schools often ranks among the highest within America. However, instead of “patting ourselves on our back”, we should remember that as a nation, our students are falling behind several other countries.

Objective studies demonstrate little relationship between dollars spent, class size, and quality of the student’s education. More importantly, studies show that a student’s success is directly related to their parents. Therefore, greater involvement between teachers and parents should be encouraged.

Parents have the primary responsibility for teaching and educating their children, both by example and through involvement. The role of teachers is to support the parents’ education of the students.

Parents also have a responsibility to support the teachers, not just through payment of taxes, but also supportive of the teacher’s need to instill discipline with discipline meaning repetitive training, examples, and setting expectations.

Parents have every reason to expect that education of students entails study of original source material to include the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, and the Federalist Papers.

For several years, the county used a formula to project salary increases for our educators. During the recent economic meltdown, it became apparent one or some factors were missing from this formula. As a result, an intended pay raise of 4.5% needed to be reduced to 0.5%.

While the unforeseen economic condition was not predictable and the Board of Education and teachers are in negotiations, the same flawed formula remains in use.

Without making corrections to this funding formula, we can all expect a similar, if not identical, snag will occur again. I support improving the educational funding formula.

CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT

Experience shows that an engaged citizen population provides for better government and improved communities. Concerned citizens need to become more involved with existing, or help create new concerned citizen organizations.

Citizen organizations play an important role in keeping fellow citizens informed about government activities. They also provide a non-government structure that can make improvements from activities such as organizing litter pick-up in rural areas, to addressing zoning concerns, providing extra sets of eyes that support local law enforcement; and instilling good citizenship examples for educating youth.

Current community organizations exist in Dunkirk, Owings, St. Leonard, and Solomons. A previous one in Huntingtown could be revived and new ones encouraged for Lusby, Prince Frederick, Port Republic, and the Beach areas.

CONCLUSION

Having visited thousands of homes throughout Calvert County as I progress with this grass-roots campaign, I hear and I listen. Voters say they love Calvert County. They know what they want and what they don’t want. They want to be left alone in their pursuit of happiness. They desire Freedom over Enslavement, liberty over tyranny, and a Calvert County that remains unique. Voters say there are needs for improvements. The voters are saying they want to see some new faces, ideas, and personalities on the Board of County Commissioners.

Anti-incumbency sentiment could present a very real challenge to those who are running for re-election. As a Candidate running for office for the first time, I believe rather than portraying a political response to this sentiment, I would simply say, I hear and understand the views of the voters. I appreciate the nuance of making improvements without drastic change in direction. As a candidate, I’ve worked diligently to be a creditable candidate in whom the voters may put their trust into doing the right thing.

Remembering a War Hero

As we remember those heroic soldiers who gave their lives to gain and maintain our freedom, one in particular comes to my mind each year. The following information came from several sources including war records, historical documents to include a few letters I now have in safe keeping as well as on-site personal touring of battlefields and military prisons. I have the reference material available if scholars desire, but for briefness, I took a literary license and removed them in this posting.

Many never heard of Silas Hagerty, who was born circa 1821 and at about age 19, married Eliza Downing May 9, 1840, in Rockland Township, Venango County, Pennsylvania. At the time of the wedding, Eliza (Downing) Hagerty was 18 years old.

Silas Hagerty worked at the different iron furnaces in Clarion County, Pennsylvania. With his son Saul A. Hagerty (age 17), Silas (age 40) enlisted in Company G of the 103rd Regiment of the Pennsylvania Infantry thereby joining one of the more unfortunate Regiments in the Union Army during the War Between the States (Civil War). According to the Adjutant General's Office February 3, 1868, Silas Hagerty enrolled December 1, 1861, in Clarion County, Pennsylvania and was mustered into the Army as a Corporal February 22, 1862, at Camp Orr, about a mile north of the Kittanning town limits, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania.

The Regimental History book identified entry as January 10, 1862. Later, Silas Hagerty became a Private, although no documentation explains the reduction in rank. Silas Hagerty, an infantry Private and Saul A. Hagerty, a Regimental Musician stayed within Company G throughout their service.

Over 400 pages detail the account of the 103rd Regiment Pennsylvania Volunteers in History of the 103d Regiment Pennsylvania Veteran Volunteer Infantry 1861-1865; Luther Dickey; Chicago, 1910. An interlibrary loan may be required for reading and may be retained only in the reference area. That history condensed here indicates that at 10 a.m. Monday February 24, 1862, this regiment including Silas and Saul A. Hagerty embarked aboard a train, traveled and then stayed in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, and Baltimore, then arrived in Washington March 3, 1862.

While in Harrisburg at Camp Curtin; named for then Governor Curtin, the Regiment marched to the capitol building and during the afternoon, February 26, 1862, received their flag directly from the Governor. Otherwise, their trip to Washington via Baltimore was uneventful. Assigned (Chain of Command) to the Second Brigade (Brigadier General William H. Keim who later died and was replaced by Brigadier General Henry W. Wessells), Third Division (Brigadier General Silas Casey), 4th Corps (Brigadier General Erasmus D. Keyes), Army of Potomac (Major General George B. McClellan), they camped on Meridian Hill just north of W Street and between 14th and 16th Avenue now known as Columbia Heights, Washington, DC.

Beginning March 28, 1862, they began "The Peninsula Campaign" by first marching across the "Long Bridge" to Alexandria, Virginia when about noon March 31, 1862, they boarded the transport Hero landing at Ft. Monroe, Virginia April 3, 1862. By April 16th, the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers began their march towards Richmond and saw minimal action during the siege of Yorktown as well as the later battle of Williamsburg (May 5 - 7, 1862), became separated from their full complement of tents, knapsacks and blankets, and were exposed to wet and cold.

Between May 7 - June 4, 1862, the Regiment became heavily engaged culminating in retreat May 31, 1862, after the Battle of Seven Pines or Fair Oaks - same battle; two different names. Controversy occurred related to this regiment reportedly "running from enemy fire". At the start of the battle a few minutes past noon Saturday May 31, 1862, three Confederate cannon balls passed overhead landing 3/4 mile to the rear. General Casey ordered General Wessells to send the 103rd Pennsylvania Regiment forward to support the advanced Union pickets (guards) 3/4 of a mile ahead of the redoubt (fortification containing several cannons). The regiment hurriedly moved forward with the various Companies filling numerous spots along the front. Company B and G were placed south of the Williamsburg Road to protect the Union's left flank. Members of this regiment who were on the front lines were the closest any Union forces had come to the Confederate capital. The Regiment maintained its position until the attack pressed them from the right. Ordered to fall back slowly, then ordered to fall back quickly, the tangled undergrowth prevented the regiment from falling back in an orderly fashion and caused them to emerge from the woods fragmented. Casey's Division on the south bank of the Chickahominy River, just east of Richmond, Virginia and heavily outnumbered by 20,000 to 5,000, held the overextended front line for three hours even though grossly exposed and unsupported before eventually being overwhelmed; thereby permitting capture of Casey's redoubt. Nonetheless, the entire Division; the 103rd Pennsylvania Regiment in particular gained an undeserved poor fighting reputation. The Union forces failure during this battle rests solely with the Generals at the highest levels - McClellan who was eventually fired by President Lincoln.

General Casey described the battle appropriately: If a portion of the division did not behave so well as could have been wished, it must be remembered to what a terrible ordeal they were subjected. Still, those that behaved discreditably were exceptional cases. It is true that the division after being nearly surrounded by the enemy and losing one-third of the number actually engaged, retreated to the second line. They would all have been prisoners of war had they delayed their retreat a few minutes longer. In my humble opinion from what I witnessed on the 31st, I am convinced that the stubborn and desperate resistance of my division saved the army on the right bank of the Chickahominy from a severe repulse, which might have resulted in a disastrous defeat.

One footnote from the Battle of Seven Pines, a Confederate Sergeant who was an aide-de-camp to Confederate General Joe Johnston was allegedly wounded in his right wrist and subsequently received a commission. That soldier, Henry Wirz, would eventually be held accountable for the sufferings at Andersonville Prison.

During the ensuing Seven Days Battle, the Regiment supported the "controlled" retreat by the Army of the Potomac from White Oak Swamp, Malvern Hill, to Harrison's Landing on the James River. This same regiment had the privilege of standing in solid line of battle and witnessing McClellen's Army of the Potomac flee from an inferior force almost as badly disorganized as was the "rawest" division of the army on the afternoon of May 31, 1862. For two days, these discredited troops stood guard between the entire army and a victorious foe, and succeeded in bringing off in safety all the wagon trains of this army, and placing them at Harrison's landing two days after the battle of Malvern Hill. For 48 hours without sleep, except as it could be snatched by small groups here and there, a few minutes at a time; drenched to the skin and chilled to the marrow by the cold drizzling rain, covered with mire to the knees, though which they had waded in following the trail of the army; at times so close to the enemy that orders were communicated in whispers; this same little group of men was the last to take its position with the rest of the army, which it did about midnight July 3, 1862.

While at Harrison's Landing, reportedly, the first playing of Taps occurred. Also, the Army of the Potomac was visited by President Abraham Lincoln July 8, 1862 for a review. Retreating east, by August 18, 1862, the 103rd PA Volunteers again passed through Williamsburg this time through Yorktown and returning to Ft. Monroe, Virginia. Their records, supplies, and other essentials were shipped down the James River, but were lost when the vessel sunk. Later, the soldiers themselves would have to pay for replenishment. The majority of the Army of the Potomac left the Peninsula eventually engaging in more notable battles at Antietam, Maryland, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and Petersburg, Virginia. Some remnants of the 4th Corps including the 103rd PA Volunteers stayed at Ft. Monroe until September 18, 1862, when they headed for Norfolk and Suffolk, Virginia. The autumn of 1862 saw the regiment involved in several expeditions and minor skirmishes in the Blackwater area of southern Virginia. Eventually, they left Suffolk December 5, 1862, reaching the Chowan River and boarded the transport Northerner; arriving in New Bern, North Carolina December 8, 1862.

Early on December 11, 1862, they began a march westward towards Goldsboro, North Carolina; defeated the Confederates December 14, 1862, across the Neuse River at Kinston, North Carolina and "behaved in an exemplary manner". They continued to advance the next day towards Whitehall; by the morning of December 17, 1862, within 2 - 3 three miles of Goldsboro, they formed a battle line overlooking the target (the railroad line and bridge). Their mission was to cutoff supplies between the Confederate capital of Richmond, Virginia and the rest of the south. Bridges and railroad lines were often cut and quickly rebuilt during the war. Upon successful completion of their mission, the regiment began their return to New Bern, North Carolina arriving December 21, 1862, and camping east of the Trent River until February 2, 1862. During that time, they engaged in several raids and expeditions as part of the US designs of preventing or disrupting the Confederates use of the North Carolina ports.

The regiment left New Bern, North Carolina May 2, 1863, aboard the transport Thomas Collyer and arrived the next day at Plymouth, North Carolina located on the Roanoke River near the Albemarle Sound, and whose inhabitants totaled less than 500. The town of Plymouth gained importance as an area for coastal trading and a shipping point including an established Customs House. The residents like much of North Carolina citizens were drawn into the Rebellion by the leaders of North Carolina, but were friendly towards the US facilitating a peaceful occupation by Union forces who first arrived in early 1862. By December 10, 1862, however, the first of three battles for Plymouth occurred when Confederate forces attacked. The battle involved significant street fighting. Resulting largely from the firings of the Union gunboats, a fire occurred which burnt much of the town leaving barely a dozen buildings. Confederate forces also caused some burning to discourage refugees from going to Plymouth.

By the time the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers arrived, May 3, 1863, the town looked rather desolate. The regiment pitched camp and began building defensive fortifications around what remained of the town. A set of earthworks (walls built out of dirt) pretty much connected four forts. In the center, Fort Williams employed three thirty pounder cannons. Placement of the other forts, Comfort, Wessells, and Gray formed a small semi-circle around the town. Company A and G were assigned to reside inside Fort Williams. During these days, time did permit the individual soldier to take care of necessities like writing letters home.

Two of the letters written by Silas Hagerty to his wife from Fort Williams remain within the family; the first surviving letter written June 2, 1863.

Plymouth North Carolina

June 2nd 1863

Fort Williams

My dear I take this chance to let you know that we are both well at this time and I hope this line may find you all well also well.

I send you sixty dollars move to Rimersburgh and if you haint got that other fifty you can wait about - 3 - days after you get this and you can go and get the money all at once we got two months pay to day. Now ther will be one hundred and ten dollars that I have sent to you in the inside of 2 week, now my dear I want you to take good care of this money use it to the best advantage if Isabella needs any money give her some. She is a good girl and all the girl we have and rite as soon as this comes to hand and tell me how much the postage is on this money and how you are all getting along. I have got but one letter from you since we came here and none from any others. Well I will quit riting for this time I remain your affectionate husband Silas Hagerty to Eliza my dear and all of my dear children give my respects to Mrs. Isabella Briggs, and James if he is at home be shure and give us some news in your next letter well be good to yourselves and remember us at a throne of grace. Goodbye.

Fone this time oh I could rite all night to you. I have you and the children standing in front of me and I talk to you all but none of you will say one word to me. Well I must quit.

I send you a tract we have no preacher of our ohn now but we have preaching once a week.

While in Plymouth, the regiment conducted several expeditions often making use of the Roanoke River for transportation. July 5, 1863, using the gunboat Commodore Perry, Company G was included on a mission towards Williamston, about 28 miles upriver from Plymouth. Upon finding Confederate forces camped out of range of the gunboats and unwilling to evacuate, the Union forces re-boarded the gunboats and returned to Plymouth. They staged raids from Plymouth at least weekly. July 10, 1863, for unknown reasons, Company G relocated outside Fort Williams. While on an expedition four days later, the company captured a rebel artilleryman who was foraging 12 miles from Plymouth. August 8, 1863, the regiment received their Springfield rifles replacing their Austrian muskets.

The swamps near Plymouth caused a malarial effluvium that depleted the effective numbers of troops available for service. Because of the widespread numbers taken ill, those not excused for duty were often on picket (guard duty). The other letter that remains within the family written by Silas Hagerty to his wife from Plymouth appears to have been hand delivered by William R. Graham of Company F 103rd PA Vol:

Plymouth North Carolina

Nov 12th 1863 co G. 103

Well my dear Eliza I take this opportunity to inform you that we are all well at this time and I trust this line may find you all enjoying the same blessing. I received your short letter that came by the hand. WM Graham it was 19 days on the way well my dear I am truly that you are out of money I have tryed to borrow some money to send as I didn't like to rite without sending you some but without succes I could not borrow any from anyone in our regiment but I think we will be paid in a few days, now we are clear out too for the last three weeks, and it is hard getting along but I don't care for our selves for we can get along better without money than you ones can but try to do the best you can till we get our pay it won't be long well take good care of your self and the children and rite often if you want me to rite often for I have rote three letters to you for every one I have got since I was home oh my dear think some times that this is a hard way of living a married life the one living about 1300 miles from the other but it is as it is. and there is no one to blame but myself I want you to rite soon and rite a big long letter and put in all the particulars let us know all about how you are and how you are off for wood and coal and what it costs and the price of flour and meat and what Silas is doing and if you have school and who is teaching well Saul has that ring ready as soon as he rites he will send it and I think it is a real nice ring and he put the letters on it that you said to put on it. I don't know when he will rite and perhaps he has rote I will know in the morning. But I will rite this and seal it to night.

The surviving letters appeared to have a gap; believe the following is a continuation of the above letter:

have had this foul we have had about five or six white frosts and varry cold nights but no appearance of snow. The nights varry cold but the days are varry nice and warm the roads are dry and dusty and the ground is dry for two foot down - our men are pretty near all well again well I think I have told you all I have rote twice to my Brother Saul since I left home and got no answer I have wrote twice to Elias too and got no answer either. Well I must conclude for tonight it is past ten oclock and I have to go on picket tomorrow and I will get no sleep tomorrow night.

Re-enlistment January 1, 1864, promised large sums of money and a furlough home; many soldiers became "Veterans" including Silas and Saul A. Hagerty. Although the previous year included numerous rumors about a formidable iron-clad boat named Albemarle being built on the Roanoke River, the early months of 1864 included a feeling that General Wessells, Commander at Plymouth, North Carolina and Naval Commander Charles W. Flusser would be able to "handle the boat". Most of the Union soldiers were looking forward to the promised 30 day furlough having received new clothing; a neat appearance home was of utmost concern. That spring, the Regimental flag was sent north to have battle honors added.

April 17, 1864, US General Ulysses S. Grant decreed the ceasing of prisoner exchanges. His reasoning was that exchanging of prisoners benefited the Confederacy since those soldiers would typically rejoin units and resume fighting against the Union whereas the Union soldiers were often broken down in health from poor prison treatment making them incapable of rejoining the fight. About 4 p.m. Sunday afternoon that same ideal spring day, when the weather was neither too hot nor too cool, in Plymouth, North Carolina, soldiers who were not on duty were in their tents awaiting the call for dress parade, writing letters home, or talking about their anticipated visits home.

The second battle for Plymouth, North Carolina began when a few shots were fired in advance of the picket lines where upon US cavalry on the Washington Road (present day Wilson Road) was attacked and pushed back. It quickly became apparent this was more than an ordinary picket raid as frequently encountered. Company G of the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers, commanded by Captain James J. Morrow along with details from other regiments were sent out and engaged the enemy skirmishers. Except for some exchanges during the night, fighting largely ceased by darkness. Accompanying the initial assault was the firing upon Fort Gray, just above the town on the Roanoke River.

Upon daybreak Monday, April 18, 1864, cannonading resumed on Fort Gray; continued for several hours, and then resumed in the afternoon. At 8 o'clock that morning, Company F of the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers relieved Company G on the Washington Road. Fighting continued as the Confederate forces began to surround the town. About 3 a.m. Tuesday, April 19, 1864, the Confederates again opened fire on Fort Gray, during which time, the ironclad Albemarle slipped past and subsequently sunk the US gunboat Southfield and in the process killed Commander Flusser.

The remainder of the US gunboat fleet fled the Roanoke for the safety of the Albemarle Sound, leaving the Union forces at Plymouth surrounded. Upon pressing the battle, the Confederate forces caused the complete surrender of the Union forces by General Wessells between 10 - 11 a.m. Wednesday April 20, 1864. Included in the 2800 prisoners were Silas and Saul A. Hagerty.

Following capture, the prisoners were corralled nearby. Within days, they began a march towards Tarboro, North Carolina passing near Williamston reaching Hamilton, North Carolina by April 23, 1864. Monday April 25, 1864, they reached the bank of Tar River near the Tarboro Bridge. Embarking upon a train Friday April 29, 1864, the prisoners left Tarboro, stopping at Goldsboro and Wilmington, North Carolina and arriving in Charleston, South Carolina Sunday May 1, 1864. The stay here was for a couple of hours whereupon they boarded open flatbed train cars and departed later passing through Savannah, and Macon, before reaching Andersonville, Georgia (Camp Sumpter) between 9 - 10 o'clock p.m., May 2, 1864. The next morning Tuesday, May 3, 1864, Captain Henry Wirz made his appearance; by early afternoon, about 400 members of the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers including Silas and Saul A. Hagerty entered the stockade. Within months, the overcrowded prison would breakdown men and take many lives.

"The haggard distressed countenance of these miserable, complaining, dejected, living skeletons, crying for medical aid and food, and cursing their government for its refusal to exchange prisoners, and the ghastly corpses, with their glazed eyeballs staring up into vacant space, with the flies swarming down their open and grinning mouths, and over their clothes infested with numerous lice, as they lay amongst the sick and dying, formed a picture of helpless, hopeless misery, which it would be impossible to portray by words or by the brush."

As US General William Tecumseh Sherman was advancing towards and eventually capturing Atlanta, Georgia September 2, 1864, the Confederates needed to relocate the 30,000 Union prisoners for fear that General Sherman would liberate these soldiers and suddenly increase his military manpower; however weakened their condition. Some members of the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers may have left between the 10th and 12th of September, in large the surviving members of the regiment within Andersonville "had bid adieu to Andersonville on the 10th day of September [1864]" .

Private Samuel J. Gibson, Company B, of the 103rd said he was among a group of 1380 prisoners who were packed 60 to a railway car and sent from there under heavy guard. The train arrived at Macon, Georgia at 2 a.m. the following morning, Augusta, Georgia, at 4 p.m., and finally arrived in Charleston, South Carolina on the morning of September 12, 1864. There, they were unloaded and marched into the fairgrounds (race course) and stayed until October. September 13, 1864, orders were issued prohibiting additional prisoners being sent to Charleston, South Carolina because of the breakout within their ranks of small pox, yellow fever, and widespread starvation. While confining the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers in Charleston, the Confederates were constructing a prison site at Florence, South Carolina. "On October 2, 1864, they moved us to Florence, S.C."

By the middle of October, the 17 usable acres at this prison held over 12,000 Union prisoners. The great majority of them look emaciated and sickly and are full of vermin, and filthy in the extreme. Three-fourths of them are without blankets and almost without clothing. Few have a change of underclothing. As a consequence, there is a great deal of suffering these cool nights and much additional sickness must follow. Most of them have erected temporary shelters, which will protect them to some extent from rain and dew until better shelters can be constructed. The principal diseases are scurvy and diarrhea, which carry off from twenty to fifty per day.

Meanwhile, during the night of October 27, 1864, the third and final battle for Plymouth, North Carolina occurred with the sinking of the Albemarle by Navy Lieutenant William B. Cushing. Following the sinking of the Albemarle, the Navy took possession of Plymouth November 1, 1864 and the Union held it for the remainder of the war.

As US General William Tecumseh Sherman continued his march through the south, his advance near Florence, South Carolina cut the last railroad link to the area February 15, 1865. Although confusion developed the Confederate officials attempted to move all able-bodied prisoners to various locations such as Salisbury and Goldsboro, North Carolina where they were paroled through the Union lines. About this time, Saul A. Hagerty, son of Silas Hagerty, Company G, 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers was released and eventually returned home to Clarion County, Pennsylvania. By February 22, 1865, the fall of Wilmington, North Carolina to the Union forces permitted this town to be included as a release point. The same day, Charles Mosher, 85th New York Regiment who shared many of the battles and travels of the 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers reported that the survivors of Andersonville, Charleston, and Florence, typically mere skeletons, were ordered to pack haversacks, board a crowded boxcar headed for freedom. About 3 p.m. March 1, "tears flowed freely, couldn't help it," as the emaciated veterans reached Union lines near Wilmington, North Carolina and were helped out by men of the 25th Michigan. Glimpsing the Stars and Stripes for the first time in over 300 days, some of the men found strength enough to walk towards a grove of trees, flop to the ground and savor a cup of coffee and the once detested hardtack.

February 1865: And by the end of the month, the Florence camp was silent.

Leaving his widow Eliza (Downing) Hagerty and 6 surviving children, Silas Hagerty never returned home. S. Hagerty and George Schell died after being released from disease incurred while prisoners of war. Silas Hagerty; paroled; reported as died March 1, 1865; Veteran.
September 1865, on an Application for Widow's Army Pension, Eliza (Downing) Hagerty states in part that Silas Hagerty whilst in the service of the United States and in the line of duty contracted chronic diarrhea and died of said disease at Florence, South Carolina on or about the 1st day of March A. D. 1865 leaving three children under the age of 16. Pension number 135058 assigned, Eliza (Downing) Hagerty began to receive $8.00 per month plus $2.00 per month for each of the three children under age 16 until they reached the age of 16. December 1865, the Adjutant General's Office reported the lack of evidence related to the death of Silas Hagerty.

In an official ceremony in 1866, the Regimental flag was returned to the regiment. It may now be viewed by appointment through the Pennsylvania Capitol Preservation Committee, Capitol Annex Building, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. April 20, 1866, The Department of the Interior Pension Office requested official evidence of the date and cause of death of Silas Hagerty (appears to have requested this of the Surgeon General). November 10, 1866, Eliza (Downing) Hagerty requests an Increase of Widows' Army Pension as approved by law July 25, 1866. Attesting to her representation is son Saul A. Hagerty, having returned from the war. February 3, 1868, the Adjutant General's Office confirms both the original enlistment and the re-enlistment of Silas Hagerty. February 5, 1868, the Treasury Department reports it issued Treasury Certificate No. 257787 in favor of Mrs. Eliza Hagerty, widow of Silas Hagerty allowing her pay to include the 1st day of March 1865.

In Clarion County, Pennsylvania September 2, 1869, Eliza (Downing) Hagerty sworn to the following statement: that she is the widow of Silas Hagerty late of said County, who was a Corporal of Co. "G" 103d Regt Penn Vol, and who died in rebel prison at Florence, S. C. about the first day of March 1865. He has never returned home, nor been heard from by any of his friends since that time. The last intelligence I had of him he was as the rebel prison aforesaid in the month of February 1865. He was there broken down in health from poor fare and bad treatment, and I have no doubt whatever of his death at or about the date above given. It is impossible for me to furnish positive evidence of the date of my husband's death. I have exhausted all the means of obtaining that information I could think of, but without success. September 21, 1869, the Claim for Widow's Pension with Minor Children was passed stating that Issue certificate for 8 dollars per month, commencing March 2, 1865, and two dollars per month additional for each of the above-named children, commencing the twenty fifth day of July, 1866.

At the age of 77, Eliza (Downing) Hagerty died September 12, 1898. A letter written by her son-in-law, Elijah Slaughenhoupt, dated September 20, 1898, to the US Pension Office stated:

Pollock PA Sept 20th 1898

J. N. Nesbit

U.S. Pension Com

Pgh Pa

Dear Sir My Mother in law Mrs. Eliza Haggerty of Callensburg Clarion Co Pa Died on the 12th of this month and their would be 2 month and 12 days pension due her. Would you kindly addvise me how to proceed to get said pension to pay on the funeral expenses as she had nothing left to bury her.

If necessary to adminsiter it would take about all for expenses.

Please advise by return mail & obligr

Yours Respectfully

E Slaughenhoupt

Pollock Po

Pension Certificate is 135058

U. S. Pension Agency, Pittsburgh, PA September 24, 1898 reported that Eliza (Downing) Hagerty widow of Silas Hagerty, Private in Company G, 103rd Pennsylvania Volunteers who was a pensioner on the rolls of this Agency, under Certificate No. 135058, and who was last paid at $12 July 4, 1898, has been dropped because of death! Date 12 Sept 1898.

Eliza (Downing) Hagerty is buried in the Perryville Cemetery, Clarion County, Pennsylvania beside her son-in-law Elijah Slaughenhoupt. Silas Hagerty was my Great, Great, Great-Grandfather, and now we also know him as a war hero.

This is How Property Tax Bills Work

Say that I sell you a product every year whose ingredients come from me and another supplier. I get to keep the money you pay for that product. Each year, I keep my ingredients the same (no change in substance, nor cost), but my supplier increases the charge for their ingredients. The total cost of that final product increases every year, and you would be paying more. Would you say that your product bill increased? If so, your costs for that product were raised.

Now, the same can be said about taxes. That product is your yearly property tax bill. Like my supplier above, the state increases their assessment (their ingredients) on your property. Like my ingredients above, the county maintains its portion (same tax rate). Just as I may claim I did not raise the cost of my ingredients, the county may claim they are not raising taxes. Given the county gets to keep the money you pay, the county government benefits. Your property tax bill increases, and you pay more. Would you say your tax bill increased? If so, your property taxes were raised.

Considering the county may say residential property taxes are kept low because commercial businesses (those who are the prime job producers) pay a larger share of the property taxes. Yet, we know that no business actually pays taxes, they pass that expense onto the consumer by charging more for their goods and services; or they head towards being out of business. Those increased consumer costs are passed along to the residents who just saw their property taxes rise.

Lastly, the county may claim that your tax bill would be lower if the assessments made by the state were lower. Assessments do not necessarily track closely with the value of your residence. Recently, the assessments increased while the value of residences decreased. The county benefits from your misfortune. If the individuals who lead the county refuse to lower their tax rate (remember their part of those ingredients) during a time when citizens are experiencing a historic economic downturn, they never will.

Adopt a Good Neighbor Policy

Calvert County government owns a golf course, Chesapeake Hills Golf Course, in Lusby. With some fanfare this spring, the golf course held a grand opening.

Will the county government use this golf course as an opportunity to adopt a good neighbor policy? So far, it has not.

There are several homes and cars along Cove Point Road that remain under attack by errant golf balls. I visited these homes and observed the damage myself. One house has so much damage to its siding, that it resembles Swiss cheese. The day I visited, one car had just been struck.

I wondered how often the windshields of those cars were replaced. One question I asked myself was if there was any incentive for the residents to replace that siding. I concluded there is no incentive as long as the attacks remain.

It is long overdue that at a minimum, the county should install proper netting at specific locations near the edge of the golf course. If the golf course management wants to know what specific locations, I would suggest they visit those homes. After all, that is what a good neighbor would do.

Proposed Real Property Tax Increase

PUBLIC STATEMENT, May 18,2010, Calvert Pines Senior Center, 7:00 p.m.

"My name is Evan Slaughenhoupt. My family and I live in the Dunkirk area of the County. I am also a candidate for county commissioner. I appreciate the opportunity to speak at this public hearing regarding the proposed real property tax increase. In this bad economy, our citizens say they are taxed enough already. We need less taxes, not more at the local level as well as the state and national levels.

Terms like "constant tax rate", "constant yield rate", and "assessable base" can be very confusing to the typical homeowner and typical voter. Bottom line, you propose taking an additional 4.6 Million Dollars in taxes from the citizens of Calvert County to spend it on government programs and services. However one may spin the subject, it is a tax increase.

On average, 4.6 Million Dollars of additional tax equates to an additional $150 for each residential home in Calvert County. However, your proposed higher taxes will not be meted out equally. Most affected by the 4.6 Million Dollars tax increase will be seniors living on a fixed income; the very citizens who are having the toughest time during this economic crisis. I believe it is fundamentally wrong to force our Senior Citizens to bear the brunt of this tax increase.

In fact, it is bad fiscal policy to raise taxes on anyone during this historic economic crisis. We need you to reduce taxes, not raise them.

Reducing the real property tax rate from 0.892 per $100 assessment down to 0.857 would result in zero real property tax increase. It is disingenuous to claim you are not raising taxes by keeping the same property tax rate. In fact, it is nothing but a slight-of-hand that citizens see-through. In real-world terms, their taxes still rise.

For anyone to propose raising taxes, whether increased tax rates or through additional taxes completely ignores what the citizens are saying. Citizens deserve the right to know what the extra 4.6 Million Dollars of tax increase will be used to fund.

In summary, during an economic crisis you are raising taxes. The National and State government resisted raising taxes this year. That is consistent with what citizens are saying. I ask that you reconsider the decision that raises taxes and increases spending. The only question remaining is whether or not the Calvert County Board of Commissioners is listening. Thank-you."

Evan Slaughenhoupt Files Official Candidacy

• April 30, 2010, assisted by Christopher, Evan formally files for Calvert County Commissioner. Evan says he views the opportunity to run as a responsibility of good citizenship.
  
  Previously, Evan involved himself in many community activities and organizations that make communities a better place to live and work. He was a member of the Calvert County Ethics Commission which serves as a watchdog on actual and potential ethical conflicts that face County employees and elected officials. Serving 2 terms as the President of the Dunkirk Area Concerned Citizens Association (DACCA), he led efforts to preserve, protect and promote the quality of life in northern Calvert County. Evan is also a member of the National Rifle Association, Maryland Taxpayers Association, Chesapeake Bay Foundation and an associate member of the League of Women's Voters of Calvert County.
  
  
  Evan, pictured at the Board of Elections with his wife Jeanne and Christopher live in Dunkirk, and are active members of Friendship United Methodist Church. Evan began his career with the United States Air Force and then later with the Department of Defense. He received a B.S. from the University of Maryland and an M.S. from the National Defense Intelligence College.
  
  As a hobby, Evan studies history and is an official Civil War Regimental Historian, volunteers for the Special Olympics of Calvert County and is a proud member of the American Legion in Chesapeake Beach.
  
  In July 2009, Evan began visiting homes throughout Calvert County listening to the concerns of fellow citizens. Having visited a couple of thousand, he'll visit several thousand more before Election Day.
  
  Listening to Calvert County Citizens, he hears what they need and deserve:

• Improvements vice Radical Changes;
• Transparency through Genuine Ethics Reform;
• Easy to Understand Zoning Processes to Improve Business Development;
• Redress of Policies whose Unintended Consequences made Land and Water Use More Difficult;
• Improved Public Safety;
• Small Government & Lower Taxes;
• Rule of Law vice Opinioned Views;
• Free Enterprise; and
• Greater Reliance on Family, Church and Charity with Less Dependency upon Government.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Authority: Citizens to Elect Evan Slaughenhoupt. Gregory Kernan, Treasurer.